求教法律英语方面的一个问题(涉及英美侵权法)

学习英美侵权法时遇到这么个问题，不是很明白，请各位大侠指教，谢谢！A purchases a new truck manufactured by D Co., from a dealer, B. The steering shaft of the truck has an imperceptible crack. While A is driving carefully along a crowded street, the shaft breaks, causing A to lose control of the vehicle. The truck jumps the curb and crashes into a store, injuring A, his son S, who is a passenger in the truck, P, a pedestrian, and T, who is the owner of the store. Which of the following is right?1）A, S and T may sue B and D on a strict liability theory.2）Action for negligence against D may be brought by A and S but not by P and T.3）None of the four plaintiffs can bring an action against B for a breach of implied warranty.4）None of the four plaintiffs can bring an action against D for a breach of implied warranty.书后答案只是给出正确答案为C本人希望高手给出一些试题各选项的详细解释，这里我有几个疑问想得到解答：1）根据严格责任理论（中国《产品质量法》第43条，美国the Second Restatement of Torts, Section402A都有阐释），A选项中的错误是否在于由“近因原则”受害人T只能向A起诉，A向T进行的赔偿可向B或D追偿?如果将A，S, T看成是受害人群体，共同起诉B或D有何错误？2）B选项，这里是否是由严格责任理论排斥了过失侵权诉讼，属于生产商和销售商的无过错责任？3）C，D选项只是被告人有差异，违反默示保证只能向销售商起诉？希望有志于研究专业法律英语的各位朋友一同探讨，共同进步！谢谢。 收起